This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
Please note that by continuing to use this site you consent to the terms of our Privacy and Data Protection Policy.
Accept

False Alarm Test September 2014

Date September 2014
Language English
Last Revision October 8th 2014

Appendix to the Anti-Virus Comparatives September 2014


Release date 2014-10-15
Revision date 2014-10-08
Test Period September 2014
Online with cloud connectivity checkbox-checked
Update allowed checkbox-checked
False Alarm Test included checkbox-unchecked
Platform/OS Microsoft Windows

Introduction

This report is an appendix to the File Detection Test September 2014 listing details about the discovered False Alarms.

Tested Products

Test Results

1.ESET, Sophos1very few FPs
2.Panda2 few FPs
3.eScan, Emsisoft, Fortinet4
4.Avira, Qihoo, Trend Micro5
5.Bitdefender, BullGuard, Kaspersky Lab, Lavasoft6
6.Tencent7
7.F-Secure9
8.Kingsoft12 many FPs
9.McAfee16
10.AVG22
11.AhnLab23
12.Baidu27
13.ThreatTrack36
14.Avast120 crazy many FPs

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2014 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(October 2014)