Malware Protection Test Enterprise September 2020 – Testresult

This report is an excerpt of the Business Security Test 2020 (August – November). For more details, please click here.

Introduction

The Malware Protection Test assesses a security program’s ability to protect a system against infection by malicious files before, during or after execution. The methodology used for each product tested is as follows. Prior to execution, all the test samples are subjected to on-access scans (if this feature is available) by the security program (e.g. while copying the files over the network). Any samples that have not been detected by the on-access scanner are then executed on the test system, with Internet/cloud access available, to allow e.g. behavioral detection features to come into play. If a product does not prevent or reverse all the changes made by a particular malware sample within a given time period, that test case is considered to be a miss. For this test, 1,063 recent malware samples were used.

Tested Products

• Acronis Cyber Protect – Advanced Edition
  12.5 | 12.5
• Avast Business Antivirus Pro Plus
  20.5 | 20.6
• Bitdefender Endpoint GravityZone
  6.6 | 6.6
• Cisco AMP for Endpoints
  7.2 | 7.2
• CrowdStrike Falcon Pro
  5.36 | 5.40
• Cybereason Cybereason
  20.1 | 20.1
• Elastic Endpoint Security
  3.53 | 3.53
• ESET Endpoint Protection Advanced Cloud
  7.2 | 7.2
• FireEye Endpoint Security
  32.30 | 32.30
• Fortinet FortiClient with FortiSandbox & FortiEDR
  6.4 | 6.4
• G DATA AntiVirus Business
  14.3 | 14.3
• K7 Enterprise Security
  14.2 | 14.2
• Kaspersky Endpoint Security
  11.4 | 11.4
• Microsoft Defender ATP's Antivirus
  4.18 | 4.18
• Panda Endpoint Protection Plus
  8.0 | 8.0
• Sophos Intercept X Advanced
  10.8 | 10.8
• SparkCognition DeepArmor
  3.3 | 3.3
• VIPRE Endpoint Protection Cloud
  12.0 | 12.0
• VMware Carbon Black Cloud
  3.5 | 3.5

Test Results

The following chart shows the results of the Business Malware Protection Test:

False positive (false alarm) test with common business software

A false alarm test done with common business software was also performed. As expected, all the tested products had zero false alarms on common business software.

	Malware Protection Rate	False Alarms on common business software
Avast, Fortinet, G Data, Microsoft, VMware	100%	0
Bitdefender, ESET, K7	99.9%	0
Cisco, FireEye, Kaspersky, Sophos	99.7%	0
Crowdstrike, Vipre	99.6%	0
Cybereason, Elastic	99.5%	0
Acronis	99.4%	0
SparkCognition	99.3%	0
Panda	99.2%	0

 

In order to better evaluate the products’ detection accuracy and file detection capabilities (ability to distinguish good files from malicious files), we also performed a false alarm test on non-business software and uncommon files. This is provided mainly just as additional information, especially for organisations which often use uncommon non-business software or their own self-developed software. The results do not affect the overall test score or the Approved Business Product award. The false alarms found were promptly fixed by the respective vendors.

FP rate	Number of FPs on non-business software
Very Low	0-5
Low	6-15
Medium/Average	16-25
High	26-50
Very High	51-100
Remarkably high	>100

 

	FP rate on non-business software
Acronis, Bitdefender, Cisco, ESET, Kaspersky	Very low
Avast, FireEye, G Data, Sophos, Vipre	Low
Elastic, Microsoft, SparkCognition, VMware	Medium/Average
CrowdStrike, Cybereason, Fortinet	High
K7, Panda	Very high
–	Remarkably high

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2020 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(October 2020)