Real-World Protection Test Enterprise August-September 2019 – Testresult

This report is an excerpt of the Business Security Test August-September 2019 – Factsheet. For more details, please click here.

Introduction

This fact sheet gives a brief overview of the results of the Business Real-World Protection Test run in August and September 2019. The overall business product reports (each covering four months) will be released in July and December. For more information about this Real-World Protection Test, please read the details available at https://www.av-comparatives.org. The results are based on a test set consisting of 371 test cases (such as malicious URLs), tested from the beginning of August till the end of September.

Tested Products

• Avast Business Antivirus Pro Plus
  19.6 | 19.6
• Bitdefender Endpoint GravityZone
  6.6 | 6.6
• Cisco AMP for Endpoints
  6.3 | 6.3
• CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection
  5.14 | 5.16
• Endgame Protection Platform
  3.50 | 3.51
• ESET Endpoint Protection Advanced Cloud
  with Cloud Administrator 7.0 | 7.0
• FireEye Endpoint Security
  30.19 | 30.19
• Fortinet FortiClient
  with FortiSandbox 6.0 | 6.0
• K7 Enterprise Security
  14.2 | 14.2
• Kaspersky Endpoint Security
  for Business Select 11.1 | 11.1
• McAfee Endpoint Security
  with Adaptive Threat Protection 10.6 | 10.6
• Microsoft Defender ATP's Antivirus
  4.18 | 4.18
• Panda Endpoint Protection Plus
  on Aether 8.0 | 8.0
• Seqrite Endpoint Security
  17.0 | 17.0
• Sophos Intercept X Advanced
  Endpoint Security 10.8 | 10.8
• SparkCognition DeepArmor
  Endpoint Protection Platform 2.1 | 2.1
• Symantec Endpoint Protection
  14.2 | 14.2
• Trend Micro Office Scan XG
  12.0 | 12.0
• VIPRE Endpoint Protection Cloud
  11.0 | 11.0

Test Results

	Blocked	User dependent	Compromised	PROTECTION RATE [Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]*	False Alarms
ESET	371	–	–	100%	1
Symantec	371	–	–	100%	3
Panda	371	–	–	100%	7
Bitdefender	371	–	–	100%	13
Microsoft	370	1	–	99.9%	35
Endgame	370	–	1	99.7%	12
VIPRE	369	–	2	99.5%	1
K7	369	–	2	99.5%	2
Kaspersky, Sophos, SparkCognition	368	–	3	99.2%	0
McAfee	368	–	3	99.2%	3
Seqrite	365	6	–	99.2%	6
FireEye	366	–	5	98.7%	0
CrowdStrike	365	–	6	98.4%	1
Fortinet	365	–	6	98.4%	2
Trend Micro	365	–	6	98.4%	10
Cisco	364	–	7	98.1%	0
Avast	364	–	7	98.1%	1

* User-dependent cases are given half credit. For example, if a program blocks 80% by itself, and another 20% of cases are user-dependent, we give half credit for the 20%, i.e. 10%, so it gets 90% altogether.

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2019 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(October 2019)