Real-World Protection Test Enterprise March-April 2019 – Testresult

This report is an excerpt of the Business Security Test March-April 2019 – Factsheet. For more details, please click here.

Introduction

This is just an excerpt of the Business Security Test March-April 2019 – Factsheet and gives a brief overview of the results of the Business Real-World Protection Test run in March and April 2019. The overall business product reports (each covering four months) will be released in July and December. For more information about this Real-World Protection Test, please read the details available at http://www.av-comparatives.org. The results are based on a test set consisting of 389 test cases (such as malicious URLs), tested from the beginning of March till the end of April.

The full report will be released in July.

Tested Products

• Avast Business Antivirus Pro Plus
  18.8 | 18.8
• Bitdefender Endpoint GravityZone
  6.6 | 6.6
• Cisco AMP for Endpoints
  6.2 | 6.2
• CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection
  4.22 | 4.24
• Endgame Protection Platform
  3.50 | 3.50
• ESET Endpoint Security
  with Remote Administrator 7.0 | 7.0
• FireEye Endpoint Security
  29.7 | 29.7
• Fortinet FortiClient
  with FortiSandbox 6.0 | 6.0
• K7 Total Security
  14.2 | 14.2
• Kaspersky Endpoint Security
  for Business Select 11.0 | 11.0
• McAfee Endpoint Security
  with Adaptive Threat Protection 10.6 | 10.6
• Microsoft Windows Defender for Enterprise
  with Intune 4.18 | 4.18
• Panda Endpoint Protection Plus
  on Aether 7.90 | 7.90
• Seqrite Endpoint Security
  17.0 | 17.0
• Sophos Intercept X Advanced
  with Intercept X Advanced 10.8 | 10.8
• SparkCognition DeepArmor
  1.47 | 2.0
• Symantec Endpoint Protection
  14.2 | 14.2
• Trend Micro Office Scan XG
  12.0 | 12.0
• VIPRE Endpoint Protection Cloud
  10.1 | 11.0

Test Results

	Blocked	User dependent	Compromised	PROTECTION RATE [Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]*	False Alarms
Kaspersky Lab, Vipre	389	–	–	100%	0
Bitdefender	389	–	–	100%	2
McAfee, Sophos	388	–	1	99.7%	1
Trend Micro	388	–	1	99.7%	18
Microsoft	387	2	–	99.7%	8
Avast	387	–	2	99.5%	0
K7	387	–	2	99.5%	2
CISCO	386	–	3	99.2%	0
ESET, FireEye	386	–	3	99.2%	2
CrowdStrike	386	–	3	99.2%	6
Panda	386	–	3	99.2%	9
Symantec	385	–	4	99.0%	2
Endgame	385	–	4	99.0%	9
Seqrite	383	4	2	99.0%	18
Fortinet	384	–	5	98.7%	1
SparkCognition	383	–	6	98.5%	2

* User-dependent cases are given half credit. For example, if a program blocks 80% by itself, and another 20% of cases are user-dependent, we give half credit for the 20%, i.e. 10%, so it gets 90% altogether.

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2019 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(May 2019)