This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
Please note that by continuing to use this site you consent to the terms of our Privacy and Data Protection Policy .
Some of our partner services are located in the United States. According to the case law of the European Court of Justice, there is currently no adequate data protection in the USA. There is a risk that your data will be controlled and monitored by US authorities. You cannot bring any effective legal remedies against this.
Accept

Real-World Protection Test Enterprise March-June 2018 – Testresult

Date June 2018
Language English
Last Revision July 16th 2018

Release date 2018-07-18
Revision date 2018-07-16
Test Period March - June 2018
Number of Testcases 1163
Online with cloud connectivity checkbox-checked
Update allowed checkbox-checked
False Alarm Test included checkbox-checked
Platform/OS Microsoft Windows
Methodology Click here

This report is an excerpt of the Business Security Test 2018 (March – June). For more details, please click here.

Tested Products

Test Results

The results below are based on a test set consisting of 1163 test cases (such as malicious URLs), tested from the beginning of March till the end of June. During May testing, Panda had a bug in their products, which caused some few malware samples to be reported in the logs, but not being blocked or warned about – the bug was rapidly fixed.

  Blocked User dependent Compromised PROTECTION RATE
[Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]*
False Alarms
Bitdefender
1163 100% 2
McAfee 1163 100% 4
Trend Micro 1163 100% 32
Kaspersky Lab
1161 2 99.8% 1
Avast 1160 3 99.7% 1
VIPRE 1159 4 99.7% 1
ESET 1156 7 99.4% 0
Emsisoft 1155 8 99.3% 0
Endgame 1151 12 99.0% 1
Panda 1150 13 98.9% 11
CrowdStrike
1149 14 98.8%
0
Microsoft
1132 31 98.7%
11
eScan
1142 21 98.2%
1
Fortinet
1142 21 98.2%
4
Saint Security 1065 98 91.6% 12
FireEye 1021 142 87.8% 0

 

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2018 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(July 2018)