Real-World Protection Test Enterprise August-November 2023 – Testresult

Tested Products

• Avast Ultimate Business Security
  23.7 | 23.8 | 23.9 | 23.10
• Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security Premium
  7.9 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 7.9
• CISCO Secure Endpoint Essentials
  8.1 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.2
• CrowdStrike Falcon Pro
  6.58 | 7.01 | 7.04 | 7.04
• Cybereason NGAV
  22.1 | 22.1 | 22.1 | 22.1
• Elastic Security
  8.9 | 8.9 | 8.10 | 8.10
• ESET PROTECT Entry with ESET PROTECT Cloud
  10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1
• G Data Endpoint Protection Business
  15.6 | 15.6 | 15.6 | 15.6
• K7 On-Premises Enterprise Security Advanced
  14.2 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 14.2
• Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business – Select, with KSC
  12.1 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.3
• Microsoft Defender Antivirus with MEM
  4.18 | 4.18 | 4.18 | 4.18
• Sophos Intercept X Advanced
  2023.1 | 2023.1 | 2023.1 | 2023.1
• Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
  10.7 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.7
• VIPRE Endpoint Detection & Response
  13.0 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 13.1
• VMware Carbon Black Cloud Endpoint Standard
  3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9
• WatchGuard Endpoint Protection Platform
  8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0

Test Results

The results below are based on a test set consisting of 503 test cases (such as malicious URLs), tested from the beginning of August 2023 till the end of November 2023.

	Blocked	User dependent	Compromised	PROTECTION RATE [Blocked % + (User dependent %)/2]*	False Alarms
Bitdefender	503	–	–	100%	2
Avast	503	–	–	100%	3
Kaspersky	502	–	1	99.8%	1
CrowdStrike	502	–	1	99.8%	16
VIPRE	501	–	2	99.6%	2
Elastic, Microsoft	500	–	3	99.4%	3
G Data	498	–	5	99.0%	3
Trellix	495	4	4	98.8%	10
K7	495	–	8	98.4%	1
CISCO	494	–	9	98.2%	7
WatchGuard	494	–	9	98.2%	21
ESET	493	–	10	98.0%	1
Sophos	491	4	8	98.0%	1
Cybereason	477	–	26	94.8%	7
VMware	467	–	36	92.8%	3

 

* User-dependent cases are given half credit. For example, if a program blocks 80% by itself, and another 20% of cases are user-dependent, we give half credit for the 20%, i.e. 10%, so it gets 90% altogether.

Copyright and Disclaimer

This publication is Copyright © 2023 by AV-Comparatives ®. Any use of the results, etc. in whole or in part, is ONLY permitted after the explicit written agreement of the management board of AV-Comparatives prior to any publication. AV-Comparatives and its testers cannot be held liable for any damage or loss, which might occur as result of, or in connection with, the use of the information provided in this paper. We take every possible care to ensure the correctness of the basic data, but a liability for the correctness of the test results cannot be taken by any representative of AV-Comparatives. We do not give any guarantee of the correctness, completeness, or suitability for a specific purpose of any of the information/content provided at any given time. No one else involved in creating, producing or delivering test results shall be liable for any indirect, special or consequential damage, or loss of profits, arising out of, or related to, the use or inability to use, the services provided by the website, test documents or any related data.

For more information about AV-Comparatives and the testing methodologies, please visit our website.

AV-Comparatives
(December 2023)